ArticleHemaSphere2026
MEK inhibition achieves robust and durable responses in Erdheim-Chester disease.
Article in HemaSphere, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare histiocytic neoplasm characterized by heterogeneous clinical manifestations and limited evidence to guide targeted therapy. While MEK inhibitors (MEKi) are increasingly used, data on their real-world efficacy, durability, and safety remain incomplete. We analyzed outcomes of patients with ECD treated with MEKi monotherapy across eight countries and assessed the dynamics and predictors of response, treatment retention, and the safety profile of MEKi. We included 170 patients and were able to evaluate response in 159 (94%) of them. Objective responses were observed in 112 patients (70%), disease stabilization in 35 (22%), and disease progression in 12 (8%). Response rates were independent of treatment lines and underlying molecular alterations. The median time to best response was 14 months, with an estimated 2-year probability of response of 61% (95% CI 51%-67%). In multivariable analysis, dyslipidemia (odds ratio [OR] 0.359, 95% CI 0.171-0.745) and neurodegeneration (OR 0.354, 95% CI 0.144-0.864) were associated with a lower probability of response to MEKi, while cutaneous and gastrointestinal involvement with a higher probability. After a median follow-up of 27 months (interquartile range [IQR] 12-57), the treatment retention rate was 76%, with most discontinuations attributable to toxicity. Adverse events were reported in 106 patients (62%) and were severe in 39 patients (23%). The estimated 2-year event-free survival was 65% (95% CI 57%-72%), and the estimated 2-year overall survival was 80% (95% CI 72%-86%). MEKi monotherapy provides robust and durable clinical efficacy in patients with ECD, with high response rates and favorable long-term outcomes, despite a substantial burden of toxicity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.