Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42840800›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

Artificial Intelligence for Prediction of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Systematic Review.

Hatan Mortada, Mustafa Qais Muhsin Al-Khafaji, Zainalabden E Jefri, Faris Sultan, Saad Alrobaiea, Feras Alshomer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hatan MortadaFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mustafa Qais Muhsin Al-KhafajiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Zainalabden E JefriFaculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Faris SultanDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Saad AlrobaieaDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Burn Unit, Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Feras AlshomerDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health and Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) impairs quality of life and function, and early detection is crucial for preventive intervention. AI models, particularly machine learning and deep learning, hold promise for improving BCRL prediction and personalized risk stratification. This systematic review evaluates AI applications for predicting BCRL and, where available, summarizes how their reported performance compared with traditional diagnostic or non-AI methods. Methods: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted in July 2024 using keywords related to breast cancer, lymphedema, and AI. Relevant studies were screened and selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, with performance metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity extracted for analysis. Results: Seven studies from 2018 to 2024 were included, with 5284 patients. Among the 5 studies reporting BCRL classification performance, AI models achieved accuracies of 81%-93.75% (mean 87.2%), mean sensitivity 85.5%, and mean specificity 87.6%. Commonly reported predictors included higher body mass index, greater lymph node burden, and receipt of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Younger age and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were associated with higher predicted risk in some studies. Conclusions: AI shows promise for early detection and risk stratification in BCRL, but current models remain exploratory rather than clinically established. Small sample sizes, data heterogeneity, absent external validation, and inconsistent calibration highlight the need for larger, multi-institutional datasets, standardized evaluation, and prospective validation before clinical integration.

Identifiers

PMID42840800
PMCPMC13641666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.