Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42840740›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2026

Affordance-based robot manipulation with flow matching.

Fan Zhang, Michael Gienger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fan ZhangHonda Research Institute EU, Offenbach, Germany.
Michael GiengerHonda Research Institute EU, Offenbach, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a framework for assistive robot manipulation that addresses two fundamental challenges: efficient adaptation of large-scale models for scene affordance understanding and effective learning of robot actions by grounding the visual affordance. To tackle the first challenge, we adopt a parameter-efficient prompt tuning method, prepending learnable text prompts to a frozen vision model to predict affordances, while considering spatial and semantic relationships in multi-task scenarios. For the second challenge, we propose a flow matching method, representing a robot visuomotor policy as a conditional process of flowing random waypoints to desired robot actions. We introduce a real-world dataset with 10 tasks to evaluate our approach. Experiments show our prompt tuning method achieves competitive or superior performance to other finetuning protocols across data scales, while satisfying parameter efficiency. Furthermore, flow matching yields more stable training and faster inference compared to diffusion policy; specifically, 1-step flow matching achieves comparable accuracy to 16-step DDIM while reducing inference time by roughly 85%. Our framework seamlessly unifies high-level parameter-efficient affordance representation learning with low-level flow matching policies, illustrating how explicit affordances serve as effective spatial grounding for flow-based policies. https://github.com/HRI-EU/flow_matching.

Indexed as

affordance learningflow matchinghuman-centered roboticsrobot manipulationvisual learning

Identifiers

PMID42840740
PMCPMC13639668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.