ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Hematoma expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage: neuroimaging biomarkers, radiomics-based prediction models, and clinical translation.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, and early hematoma expansion (HE), defined as an increase in hematoma volume on follow-up imaging, is a major determinant of early neurological deterioration and poor outcomes. Accurate, hyperacute prediction of HE is critical for guiding precise interventions, such as intensive blood pressure management and surgical evacuation. This narrative review examines the progression of prediction models from univariate predictors to systems incorporating artificial intelligence (AI), with particular attention to risk factors, model validation, and clinical translation. We further examine the validation status of current prediction models and the methodological and practical barriers to their clinical implementation. We review the progression from established independent predictors, such as the CT angiography (CTA) spot sign (SpS) and non-contrast CT (NCCT) island sign (IS), to multivariable clinical scoring systems, radiomics-based machine learning (ML) approaches, and deep learning (DL) models, while also discussing emerging generative architectures. Furthermore, major clinical trials evaluating strategies to limit HE are reviewed. Finally, the current challenges and future prospects of predictive models of HE are also elucidated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.