ReviewPublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026
Health interventions and stakeholder roles in neonatal mortality reduction within low-income countries: A scoping review.
Review in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Neonatal mortality continues to represent a major global health challenge, with the highest mortality rates being observed in low-income countries (LICs). Despite the adoption of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.2, there has been limited progress in reducing deaths due to preterm birth complications, birth asphyxia, and infections among newborns. In order to inform future policy and implementation strategies, it is essential to understand which neonatal health interventions have been implemented since 2015 and which stakeholders have been involved in their implementation and funding. This scoping review maps health interventions implemented in low-income countries (LICs) since the adoption of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.2 in 2015, targeting key causes of neonatal mortality: prematurity, birth asphyxia, and infections. It also explores multi-stakeholder partnerships supporting implementation and financing. Study design: Scoping review. Methods: Medline Ovid, Embase Ovid, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were searched for peer-reviewed literature, and Google Scholar was searched for grey literature, covering an intervention period from 2015 to 2025. The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and was reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A protocol was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF-ID cdpr2). Results: 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. Interventions were clustered into six thematic categories: quality of neonatal care improvement initiatives (n = 6), neonatal resuscitation training (n = 5), Kangaroo Mother Care implementation strategies (n = 4), pharmaceutical and nutritional interventions (n = 4), mHealth interventions (n = 1), and thermal and respiratory support (n = 2). Implementation was largely facilitated through multi-stakeholder partnerships involving public health facilities, academic institutions, non-profit organizations (NPOs), non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and governmental authorities. Conclusions: Multi-stakeholder partnerships play a crucial role in the implementation of neonatal health interventions in LICs, with public and non-profit actors most frequently engaged. However, limited reporting on stakeholder roles and financing mechanisms raises concerns about long-term sustainability. Greater transparency in implementation and funding processes is needed to accelerate progress toward achieving SDG 3.2 by 2030.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.