ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Tumor organoids for testing metabolic flexibility in precision oncology.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumors adapt their metabolism to fluctuating nutrients, hypoxia, stromal interactions, immune pressure, and treatment. Tumor organoids are attractive systems in which to test this flexibility, but existing reviews have largely emphasized organoid applications, physiologic culture conditions or metabolomics workflows rather than the strength of evidence behind individual metabolic claims. Here, we address a narrower problem: which metabolic properties of a patient tumor are directly retained or recreated in organoid culture? We evaluate organoid evidence using three levels of support: direct metabolic measurements and perturbation in organoids, biological mechanisms established in other models that require organoid validation, and translational associations that require prospective clinical testing. Recent studies provide direct advances in pancreatic cancer organoids, including subtype-specific oxidative and glycolytic states, KRAS-associated cholesterol dependence and hypoxia-driven invasion, and in gastric and colorectal models where engineered co-cultures expose niche-dependent lipid or immune responses. These findings also expose a central gap: matched benchmarking of organoid metabolic flux and spatial heterogeneity against native tumors remains uncommon. We propose a validation framework based on physiologically specified environments, spatial and isotope-resolved measurements, multi-compartment co-culture and prospective linkage of functional readouts to patient outcomes. Tumor organoids can therefore advance cancer metabolism most credibly as tested, context-specific models rather than assumed replicas of metabolic flexibility
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.