Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42840620›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2026

Malignancy yield and clinical predictors in radiologically detected adult urachal anomalies: A retrospective cohort study.

Per Blomqvist, Lala Joulhay Ian, Emelie Holmin, Suleiman Abuhasanein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Per BlomqvistDepartment of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
Lala Joulhay IanDepartment of Surgery, Urology Section NU-Hospital Group Uddevalla Region Västra Götaland Sweden.
Emelie HolminBra Liv Hälsan. Primary Care Centre Region Jönköping County Sweden.
Suleiman AbuhasaneinDepartment of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3756-0397

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the occurrence of bladder malignancy or papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUNLMP) detected at initial evaluation or during follow-up among adults with radiologically reported urachal anomalies, and to explore clinical factors associated with neoplasia. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective single-centre cohort study. Adult patients with radiologically reported urachal anomalies between 2000 and 2024 were identified through institutional radiology information system and report archive and underwent detailed chart review. Patients with a prior history of bladder or upper urinary tract malignancy were excluded. Clinical presentation, imaging findings, cystoscopy, histopathology and outcomes were analysed. Clinical variables associated with malignancy were explored using Firth penalized logistic regression. Results: A total of 245 patients were included: 92/245 (38%) had incidental/asymptomatic findings and 153/245 (62%) were symptomatic. Bladder malignancy/PUNLMP was detected in 14/245 patients (5.7%) overall, including 0/92 incidental/asymptomatic patients (0%) and 14/153 symptomatic patients (9.2%). Macroscopic haematuria was present in 12/14 patients with malignancy/PUNLMP and was associated with a higher frequency of neoplasia: 12/66 patients with haematuria (18%) versus 2/179 without haematuria (1%; p<0.001). In exploratory multivariable analysis, macroscopic haematuria remained associated with malignancy/PUNLMP (OR 5.29, 95% CI 1.10-39.5). Most detected tumours were of non-urachal histology, and 8/14 (57%) were stage T2 or higher. Conclusions: Incidentally detected urachal anomalies in adults were not associated with malignancy during follow-up, suggesting that conservative management may be appropriate in asymptomatic patients. In contrast, symptomatic presentation, particularly macroscopic haematuria, warrants thorough urological evaluation due to its association with a substantially increased risk of bladder malignancy.

Indexed as

adultasymptomaticbladder cancerhaematuriaincidental findingsmalignancy riskurachal anomaliesurachus

Identifiers

PMID42840620
PMCPMC13639531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.