ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
The acidic tumor microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma: a barrier to adoptive cellular immunotherapy.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The metabolic interface between tumor and immune cells is an emerging determinant of immunotherapy resistance, yet its therapeutic exploitation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains limited. Adoptive cellular immunotherapies, including NK cell infusion, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells, have transformed hematologic oncology but repeatedly fail to achieve durable responses in HCC. We argue that an underappreciated driver of this resistance is the acidic tumor microenvironment (TME): hypoxia-driven glycolytic reprogramming acidifies the HCC niche through lactate and proton accumulation, lowering extracellular pH (pHe) to approximately 6.5-6.8 (measured 6.66 ± 0.19 in human HCC by CEST MRI), rewiring macrophages, neutrophils, dendritic cells, NK cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and T lymphocytes toward immunosuppressive or exhausted states. Although lactate and tumor acidity have each been reviewed extensively, the specific implications of acidosis for the design and delivery of cell-based therapies remain scattered and unsynthesized, a gap of growing urgency as the first pH-targeting and acidity-armored cellular products enter clinical testing, as summarized in this review. This mini review delineates how the acidic TME is established in HCC, summarizes cell-type-specific mechanisms of acidosis-driven immune dysfunction, and critically evaluates unresolved issues: the incomplete dissociation of acidity- versus lactate-mediated effects, the metabolic double-edged sword of systemic glycolytic blockade, and the gap between preclinical pH modulation and clinical translation. We conclude that ex vivo metabolic preconditioning and acidity-responsive cell engineering, rather than systemic metabolic intervention, offer the most tractable path toward durable cellular immunotherapy in HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.