ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2026
Integrating network medicine and foundation models reveals cell-type-specific regulatory alterations in Alzheimer's disease.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease is a complex neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive cognitive decline and neuroinflammation. Although its molecular hallmarks are well documented, cell-type-specific mechanisms driving gene dysregulation remain elusive. While single-cell RNA sequencing resolves cellular states, most studies focus on individual genes rather than coordinated programs. Moreover, a gap persists between interpretable network-based models and artificial intelligence foundation models, which capture complex interactions but lack mechanistic transparency. Whether these approaches converge or provide complementary views remains unclear. We present an integrated study combining SCANet, for reconstructing co-expression and gene regulatory networks, with scGPT foundation model. Applied to over 1.3 million cells across 18 cell types, this approach revealed that Alzheimer-associated transcriptional changes concentrate within coherent co-expression modules, for extracellular matrix organization, immune signaling, and neuronal communication. Genes prioritized by scGPT were largely embedded within SCANet modules, indicating convergence at the gene level; however, higher-order architecture agreement was limited and cell-type-specific. Thus, scGPT highlights influential genes, whereas SCANet resolves their modular organization, providing complementary information. By integrating both methods, we recovered known Alzheimer-related pathways and identified novel regulatory candidates, including the CEBPB-CENPQ axis in vulnerable SST-GABA interneurons. This demonstrates that combining network biology with foundation models enables gene prioritization and mechanistic interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.