ArticleJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology2026
Taking a pragmatic approach to implement colonoscopy quality at a health system level: Ontario's colonoscopy quality strategy.
Article in Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To describe Ontario's colonoscopy quality strategy (OCQS), to review outcomes to date, to assess it against the Health Quality Ontario framework, and to identify areas for improvement. Methods: We provide a descriptive analysis of the OCQS, tracing its development from the launch of the ColonCancerCheck program in 2007 through subsequent initiatives, including funding mechanisms, evidence-based standards, systematic data collection, provider-level performance reporting and feedback. The impact of the OCQS is assessed via temporal trends in colonoscopy quality indicators. Results: The OCQS has evolved into a multipronged, system-wide strategy emphasizing evidence generation, collaboration with clinical leaders, and embedding quality improvement within regional cancer programs. Key achievements include standardized reporting, provincial and regional accountability structures, and integration of quality metrics into practice. Over time, there has been improvement in colonoscopy and screening indicators, reflecting the impact of the OCQS. Challenges include addressing endoscopists with persistent performance issues, optimizing accountability mechanisms, and sustaining engagement in a resource-constrained system. Conclusions: Ontario's experience demonstrates that implementing colonoscopy quality initiatives within a complex health system requires pragmatism, iterative refinement, and continuous evaluation. Lessons learned may inform other jurisdictions in designing and scaling endoscopy quality strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.