ArticleJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology2026
Real-world effectiveness and predictors of need for extended induction of mirikizumab therapy in ulcerative colitis.
Article in Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mirikizumab (MIR), a selective interleukin-23p19 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in randomized trials for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Real-world data remain limited. Here, we evaluated the effectiveness, durability, and safety of MIR in routine clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicentre cohort study of adults with UC initiating MIR at two tertiary centres in Canada. Clinical, biomarker, endoscopic, and safety outcomes were assessed at weeks 12, 28, and 52. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free (CSF) clinical remission at week 12. Secondary outcomes included CSF clinical remission at weeks 28 and 52, CSF clinical response, mucosal healing, treatment persistence, extended induction, and serious adverse events. Predictors of extended induction were evaluated using logistic regression. Results: Eighty-two patients were included; 94% were previously exposed to at least one advanced therapy. CSF clinical remission was achieved in 24% of patients at week 12, 35% at weeks 28, and 33% at week 52, with corresponding CSF clinical response rates of 45%, 53%, and 40%. Moreover, 40% of the cohort received extended induction. In the extended induction subgroup, CSF clinical remission was observed in 19% at week 28 and 22% at week 52, with CSF clinical response rates observed in 37% and 30%, respectively. Early CSF clinical response at week 12 was associated with treatment persistence. The incidence of serious adverse events was low, with no new safety signals. Conclusions: In this multicentre real-world Canadian cohort of predominantly treatment-experienced patients with UC, MIR demonstrated clinically relevant effectiveness, acceptable durability, and a favourable safety profile over 1 year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.