Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42840555›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026

Connecting digital food literacy and sustainable eating in children and adolescents: a focused mini review of evidence gaps and educational priorities.

Lu Xing, Xueqi Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lu XingSchool of Preschool Education, Changsha Normal University, Changsha, China.
Xueqi WuTaylor's Culinary Institute, Faculty of Social Sciences & Leisure Management, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children and adolescents learn about food through digital and physical environments while developing an understanding of dietary effects on human and planetary health. Digital healthy-eating education, food-literacy education, and sustainable-diet education have nevertheless developed along largely separate trajectories. This focused Mini Review examines interventions that combine a substantive digital educational mechanism, a food-literacy capacity, and an explicit sustainability target in young people. Database-specific searches of Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and ERIC plus citation checking yielded three eligible studies; exploratory high-sensitivity checks did not reveal an evident additional match. The studies evaluated an adolescent food-systems simulation with guided inquiry, online family cooking with text-message support, and a seven-mission family mHealth program addressing food waste and plant-based proteins. They provide preliminary evidence for three educational configurations rather than a basis for comparative effectiveness claims. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool assessment identified credible alignment between questions and data, alongside immediate qualitative outcomes, single-arm designs, selective outcome completion, and limited control of confounding. The synthesis distinguishes food literacy delivered through digital media-the eligibility construct-from critical literacy about digital food environments, which remains a proposed research direction. Current evidence supports explicit specification of digital affordance, literacy capacity, sustainability target, participant role, outcome tier, and inferential strength. Future trials should recruit more diverse populations, strengthen child-led participation, separate child and household outcomes, and test longer-term behavioral and material effects.

Indexed as

adolescentschildrendigital food literacydigital interventionsfood educationfood systemsfood wastesustainable diets

Identifiers

PMID42840555
PMCPMC13639947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.