ArticleACS omega2026
Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Mass Conservation Constraints for Predicting Particle Sedimentation in Non-Newtonian Suspensions.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the challenge of sparse monitoring data for particle sedimentation in non-Newtonian suspensions in stirred tanks and the risk of non-physical solid-phase inventory drift in purely data-driven models during long-term extrapolation, this study proposes a parametrized physics-informed neural network (P-PINN). The method embedded a two-dimensional depth-averaged sedimentation equation and a macroscopic mass conservation constraint into the neural-network framework. Specifically, to reduce the gradient competition between local data fitting and global physical constraints, a ramp strategy was designed to gradually adjust the weight of the conservation term. Furthermore, a log-time mapping was also introduced to improve the resolution of early-stage high-gradient sedimentation dynamics. The model was validated by using nine-point ultrasonic thickness measurements from bench-scale experiments under multiple operating conditions. The results showed that P-PINN successfully reconstructed the continuous spatiotemporal evolution of the sediment bed with a global root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 3.71 mm. It also exhibited stable generalization in leave-one-out tests. Compared with purely data-driven baselines, the ramp strategy substantially reduced solid-phase inventory drift during long-term extrapolation and helped maintain macroscopic mass conservation. This study offers a physically constrained surrogate modeling approach for sediment-bed prediction under sparse observations with potential for online monitoring of complex multiphase flow systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.