ReviewStrategies in trauma and limb reconstruction
A Systematic Review of the Systematic Utilitarian Procedure for Extremity Reconstruction of the Hip (SUPERhip) for Congenital Femoral Deficiency with Reference to Recent Extra-network Cohort Findings.
Review in Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims and background: Congenital femoral deficiency (CFD) is a rare limb anomaly requiring Hip reconstruction before femoral lengthening. The Systematic Utilitarian Procedure for Extremity Reconstruction of the Hip (SUPERhip), introduced by Paley in 1997, is the principal protocol for type Ib and type II CFD. No systematic review has consolidated outcomes in this population. This review synthesised radiographic outcomes, complications and protocol fidelity. Materials and methods: PubMed, Google Scholar, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 [International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD420261386450]. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed cohorts of three or more patients with Paley type Ib or type II CFD (subtypes IIa and SUPERhip-eligible IIb) treated with the full SUPERhip protocol. Single-arm narrative synthesis was performed; meta-analysis was not feasible due to outcome reporting heterogeneity. Results: Two cohorts met the inclusion criteria: Paley et al. (106 procedures, 1997-2012) and Violante Júnior et al (26 patients, 2005-2020). Outcome reporting was structurally asymmetric: Paley et al. (pooled Conclusion: The SUPERhip procedure achieves substantial radiographic correction in Paley type Ib CFD; a within-cohort signal from a single primary dataset suggests that fixed-angle fixation with intra-osseous BMP2 may reduce late complications. Outcomes are reported asymmetrically; no peer-reviewed type-II-specific cohort outcomes exist; MPFA is reported in no cohort; and the evidence base remains concentrated within a single methodological lineage. Clinical significance: Hip reconstruction before femoral lengthening is supported by comparator literature for both type Ib and type Ia CFD. Within this limited evidence base, canonical SUPERhip with fixed-angle fixation and BMP2 is the best-evidenced approach for type Ib; a within-network supply-constrained variant achieved comparable radiographic correction. Late Hip instability is a post-lengthening risk in type Ia CFD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.