ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Immune and inflammatory radiogenomics of radiotherapy-induced normal-tissue toxicity: genetic susceptibility, mechanisms, risk prediction, and clinical translation.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiotherapy is indispensable for cancer control, yet acute and late normal-tissue toxicities remain major limits to treatment intensity and survivorship. Considerable interindividual variation persists after clinical and dosimetric factors are considered, motivating radiogenomic studies of inherited susceptibility. This review compares common and rare germline variation, association and sequencing designs, polygenic risk scores, and functional evidence through an immunological framework. Radiation-induced DNA damage and organelle stress release danger-associated signals and cytosolic DNA that engage pattern-recognition pathways, including cGAS-STING, and initiate endothelial and epithelial inflammatory programs. Cytokines, chemokines, inflammasomes, recruited myeloid cells, lymphocytes, senescent cells, and fibroblasts then determine whether injury resolves or progresses to chronic immune dysregulation and fibrosis. Germline variants may modify these responses, but pathway plausibility is not equivalent to variant-specific causality. The strongest evidence combines a replicated clinical association with dose adjustment, regulatory annotation, allele-specific perturbation, and validation in organ-relevant immune-stromal models. Integrated prediction should combine genomic susceptibility with normal-tissue imaging, dose-volume exposure, baseline inflammatory state, comorbidity, and systemic therapy. Germline associations with checkpoint-inhibitor toxicity provide a rationale for studying radio-immunotherapy, although radiation-specific genetic interactions remain unvalidated. No current common variant or polygenic score justifies reducing curative dose or target coverage. Near-term translation is more appropriately directed toward risk-adapted surveillance, supportive care, and genotype-enriched prevention trials. An immune-centered radiogenomic framework can connect inherited susceptibility to damage sensing, inflammatory amplification, resolution failure, and tissue remodeling while preserving the distinction between mechanistic evidence and clinical utility. Graphical summary: inherited susceptibility modifies the sequence from radiation-induced damage sensing and immune activation to resolution, repair, or chronic inflammation and fibrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.