ReviewFrontiers in oral health2026
OpenNotes in dentistry as a strategy for patient engagement: opportunities, barriers, and a framework for implementation.
Review in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient engagement is increasingly recognized as a cornerstone of high-quality, patient-centered care. Although the OpenNotes initiative, which gives patients direct access to their clinical notes through electronic health records, has demonstrated significant benefits in medicine, its application in dentistry remains largely unexplored despite the elective and decision-intensive nature of dental care. This targeted narrative review was informed by a PubMed search conducted on March 26, 2026, using the terms ("OpenNotes" OR "shared clinical notes" OR "patient access to records") AND ("dentistry" OR "dental"), which identified 12 articles and no studies directly addressing OpenNotes implementation in dental practice. Consequently, the anticipated benefits for dentistry are derived by analogy with medical evidence and should be regarded as hypotheses requiring empirical testing rather than established findings. We examined the potential of OpenNotes as a patient engagement strategy in dentistry, including its benefits, the structural and technical barriers unique to dental documentation, and the enabling role of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and teledentistry, and found that, based on evidence from medical OpenNotes programs, note sharing may improve treatment adherence, shared decision-making, and patient empowerment in dentistry as well, although important barriers remain, including procedure-centric documentation, specialized terminology, fragmented electronic health record adoption, and privacy regulations; overall, OpenNotes appears to hold substantial promise for enhancing patient engagement in dentistry, but realizing this potential will require coordinated efforts in documentation standardization, clinician training, technology infrastructure, and regulatory compliance, with pilot implementation in academic dental institutions representing a pragmatic first step toward building an evidence base for broader adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.