ReviewFrontiers in neurology2026
Multimodal artificial intelligence in epilepsy: antiseizure medication response, epileptogenic zone localization, and surgical outcome prediction.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epilepsy remains difficult to manage because approximately 30% of patients develop drug-resistant epilepsy, epileptogenic zones may remain occult on conventional magnetic resonance imaging, and surgical outcomes vary substantially. Multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) can integrate structural and functional MRI, positron emission tomography, diffusion imaging, electroencephalography, intracranial electrophysiology, and clinical information to support quantitative decision-making. This targeted narrative review synthesizes published evidence on three clinical tasks: prediction of antiseizure medication response, localization of epileptogenic zones, and prediction of surgical outcomes. We summarize machine-learning, deep-learning, and brain-network approaches, together with representative validation strategies and performance metrics. Current studies demonstrate promising task-specific performance, but their results should not be compared directly because cohorts, endpoints, modalities, and validation designs differ markedly. Major barriers include small single-center datasets, inconsistent acquisition and annotation, incomplete multimodal data, limited external validation, and insufficient interpretability. Future priorities include standardized multicenter datasets, prospective evaluation, privacy-preserving collaboration, interpretable fusion models, and clinically integrated human-AI workflows. At present, multimodal AI should be regarded as supervised decision support rather than a replacement for specialist interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.