ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2026
Neural substrates of duration serial dependence: Putamen suppression of the prior duration trace.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perceptual judgments are biased toward recent experience, a phenomenon called serial dependence. For orientation and motion, this carryover has a demonstrated locus in the early visual cortex; for time, the circuits that hold the previous duration are unknown. Using fMRI, we asked where the preceding duration is represented, and whether the same neural mechanism carries recent information about a non-temporal feature of the same stimulus. Participants viewed a moving random-dot display and reproduced either its duration or its direction, retro-cued as to which feature to report, thereby separating the memory trace from the demands of task switching. Duration reproduction was attracted toward the preceding duration, four times more strongly when the same task was repeated. Direction judgments exhibited a much smaller bias that reversed sign with the preceding task. The preceding duration was negatively associated with retro-cue-locked activity in the bilateral putamen, the region where this effect survived whole-brain correction. The estimate held after accounting for both current and preceding responses. Direction produced no comparable signal anywhere. Switching from the direction task to the time task recruited the inferior frontal junction and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, neither of which carried a preceding-duration effect. The prior-duration signal, therefore, localized to the dorsal striatum, distinct from the frontoparietal regions in task reconfiguration. These findings argue against a unitary neural mechanism for serial dependence and suggest that recent-history biases are likely domain-specific: for perceived time, the critical trace resides in the striatum rather than in the visual cortex.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.