ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2026
A Component-Based Leisure Activity Assessment for Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Preliminary Investigation.
Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often have limited opportunities to participate in leisure activities, and behavior analysts need guidance in identifying activities their clients prefer. To support both groups, we present a user-friendly assessment that considers client preference and activity engagement when determining suitable leisure activities for individuals with ASD. Three adults with ASD who required significant support participated across three phases. During the first phase, concurrent operant arrangements were used to develop a preference profile for three leisure activity components: social interaction versus no interaction, electronic versus nonelectronic activities, and stationary activities versus those requiring movement. All participants showed clear preferences. The second phase used the resulting preference profile to assess engagement and the occurrence of problem behavior with leisure activities that matched or did not match their profile. Participants were more engaged with matched activities. Although problem behavior was rare, it occurred at lower rates with activities matched to the preference profile. The final phase assessed preference for matched versus unmatched leisure activities, with all participants preferring matched activities. These findings add to the literature by demonstrating an objective method for designing and evaluating new leisure experiences under controlled but naturalistic conditions. • The current study provides a new data-driven approach to identifying leisure preferences for adults with ASD. • The current study evaluates components of leisure activities to tailor leisure options effectively. • Leisure activities aligned with preferences result in higher engagement and fewer problem behaviors. • The assessment is adaptable for various populations, including transition planning and aging clients. • The current study fills a gap by offering an efficient means of evaluating preference for leisure activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.