Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42840411›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2026

Testing feedback and social norms messages to increase participation: the BESTcc randomised controlled trial among non-respondents in population-based colorectal cancer screening programmes in Tuscany.

Giuseppe Gorini, Elisa Betti, Patrizia Falini, Giulia Carreras, Beatrice Mallardi, Manola Migliori, Daniela Giorgi, Daniela Tramalloni, Alessandro Cosimi, Giulia Venturi and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Giuseppe GoriniIstituto per lo Studio la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica (ISPRO), Italy.
Elisa BettiIstituto per lo Studio la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica (ISPRO), Italy.
Patrizia FaliniIstituto per lo Studio la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica (ISPRO), Italy.
Giulia CarrerasIstituto per lo Studio la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica (ISPRO), Italy.
Beatrice MallardiIstituto per lo Studio la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica (ISPRO), Italy.
Manola MiglioriIstituto per lo Studio la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica (ISPRO), Italy.
Daniela GiorgiAzienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Italy.
Daniela TramalloniAzienda USL Toscana Centro, Italy.
Alessandro CosimiAzienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Italy.
Giulia VenturiInstitute for Computational Linguistics "A. Zampolli" (CNR-ILC) Pisa, Italy.
Andrea Amelio RavelliInstitute for Computational Linguistics "A. Zampolli" (CNR-ILC) Pisa, Italy.
Anna IossaIstituto per lo Studio la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica (ISPRO), Italy.
Francesca BattistiIstituto per lo Studio la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica (ISPRO), Italy.
Sandro Tiziano StoffelResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Paola MantelliniIstituto per lo Studio la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica (ISPRO), Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

•Trial embedded in routine CRC screening for non-responders in Tuscany.•RCT tested social norms and feedback to boost FIT screening uptake.•All intervention arms improved FIT return vs standard invitation.•Combined messages offered no added benefit over single interventions.

Indexed as

Behavioural economicsColorectal cancer screeningFeedbackSocial normsTrial

Identifiers

PMID42840411
PMCPMC13639607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.