ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026
Loneliness, problematic digital media use, and nutritional-metabolic vulnerability in adolescents from single-parent households: an integrative review of eating- and sleep-related pathways.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescents from single-parent households may experience household time, economic, supervisory, and routine-related constraints that are relevant to psychosocial well-being, digital media use, eating behavior, sleep, and metabolic health. The objective of this integrative review was to synthesize evidence on the associations of loneliness and problematic digital media use with eating- and sleep-related behaviors in adolescents and to examine how single-parent household characteristics may influence these relationships. The review applies a contextual-behavioral vulnerability model in which household characteristics are treated as contextual modifiers; loneliness and problematic digital media use as the principal psychosocial and behavioral exposures; emotional eating, irregular meal timing, distracted eating, sleep disruption, circadian delay, and sedentary behavior as candidate intermediate processes; and diet quality, adiposity, and metabolic vulnerability as distal outcomes. Eligible evidence included peer-reviewed empirical studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses focused primarily on adolescents and examining at least one relevant association among family structure, loneliness, digital media use, eating behavior, sleep, energy balance, adiposity, or metabolic indicators. Studies explicitly analyzing single-parent households were treated as direct evidence, whereas broader adolescent or mechanistic studies were included when direct evidence was limited and were interpreted as indirect evidence. Direct single-parent evidence was concentrated mainly on family meals, screen-related routines, physical activity, and weight-related outcomes. Broader adolescent evidence associated loneliness with emotional eating and problematic digital media use with breakfast skipping, irregular meals, distracted eating, poorer diet quality, and sleep disruption. Evidence linking these behavioral patterns to adiposity, insulin sensitivity, circadian regulation, stress responsivity, and appetite-related signaling remained predominantly indirect and observational. Longitudinal, objectively measured, and biomarker-informed studies are needed to test these relationships directly in adolescents from single-parent households.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.