ArticleAcute medicine & surgery
Association Between Hour-by-Hour ICU Admission Timing and 24-h Mortality: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study.
Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Prior studies of ICU admission timing often use broad categories (day vs. night), potentially masking hour-level effects. We examined hour-by-hour ICU admission timing and mortality, with attention to nighttime periods and routine handovers. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective observational study in a closed ICU with 24/7 on-site intensivist coverage, using prospectively registered data from the Japanese Intensive Care Patient Database. Adults (≥ 18 years) admitted to the E-ICU between April 2017 and July 2025 were included. Admission hour (0-23) was modeled as a continuous exposure using restricted cubic splines (reference 14:00). The primary outcome was 24-h mortality and the secondary outcome was ICU mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was adjusted for demographics, APACHE II, invasive mechanical ventilation at admission, comorbidities, diagnostic categories, admission source, and post-cardiac arrest status. Bootstrap resampling was used to estimate 95% confidence intervals. Additional analyses examined handover, nighttime, and 24-h periodic patterns. Results: Among 5724 patients, 24-h and ICU mortality were 3.4% and 10.6%, respectively. Compared with 14:00, adjusted odds of 24-h mortality were higher in the early morning. The early-evening estimate was imprecise, with the 95% CI including unity. In contrast, ICU mortality showed no clear temporal pattern. Handover comparisons showed no clear mortality association; nighttime admission was not associated with higher mortality, and cosinor analysis was nonsignificant. Conclusion: Hour-by-hour analysis showed higher adjusted odds of 24-h mortality in the early morning, whereas evidence of an increase in the early evening was inconclusive. Direct comparisons of handover periods showed no clear association with mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.