Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42840370›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2026

Current Practices for the Assessment and Treatment of Severe Problem Behavior: A Colorado-Based Survey.

Patrick W Romani, Mathew C Luehring

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patrick W RomaniDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13123 E. 16th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7722-4227
Mathew C LuehringDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13123 E. 16th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2226-167X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Credentialed behavior analysts receive training to implement functional behavior assessment (FBA) to ultimately design function-based behavioral treatment for clients engaging in severe problem behavior. Severe problem behavior includes aggression (e.g., hitting, biting), property destruction (e.g., displacing furniture), and self-injury (e.g., self-biting) that has the potential to harm others or the client themselves. Although studies have surveyed current practices of credentialed behavior analysts when assessing problem behavior, a comprehensive survey of the entire assessment and treatment process is absent from the literature. To the extent that survey-based data lead to an understanding of current practices, it seems helpful to understand safety assessment practices, protective equipment usage, and use of single-case designs (SCD). The current study recruited 174 credentialed behavior analysts working with clients engaging in severe problem behavior. Participants responded to a Qualtrics survey to share the frequency with which they selected various FBA and behavioral treatment approaches to address severe problem behavior. We additionally asked participants to share ways they assess safety when working with this population of clients and how they evaluate treatment progress with SCD. Results replicated previous research showing credentialed behavior analysts most often use nonexperimental FBA to assess problem behavior. We will also present and discuss data regarding safety assessment, use of SCD, and treatment selection. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-025-01076-7.

Indexed as

Functional behavior assessmentFunctional communication trainingPersonal protective equipmentStaff training

Identifiers

PMID42840370
PMCPMC13638825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.