Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42840329›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology2026

Establishing a benchmark for patient comfort during colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy using the St. Paul's Endoscopic Comfort Scale (SPECS).

Aein Zarrin, Neal Shahidi, Cherry Galorport, Hong Qian, Robert Enns, Jennifer J Telford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aein ZarrinDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Neal ShahidiDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Cherry GalorportDivision of Gastroenterology, St. Paul's Hospital, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Colubmia, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
Hong QianCenter for Advancing Health Outcomes, Providence Research, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
Robert EnnsDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Jennifer J TelfordDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6884-6147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and study aims: Patient comfort during endoscopy is an important performance measure. However, performance benchmarks for patient comfort have not been established. The aim of this study is to establish benchmarks for patient comfort during colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) using the St. Paul's Endoscopic Comfort Scale (SPECS). Patients and methods: Patient, nurse, and physician focus groups were conducted to establish an acceptable threshold of comfort using SPECS. SPECS for colonoscopy and EGD at St. Paul's Hospital from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023, were collected. Using the SPECS threshold, we calculated benchmarks using 3 approaches: (1) 75th percentile, (2) the mean of the top 25% of physicians, and (3) Achievable Benchmark of Care (ABC), which adjusts performance for procedural volume. Results: Four patients, 6 endoscopy nurses, and 10 physicians participated in separate focus groups: a SPECS ≤ 3 was the comfort threshold determined. SPECS from 17 405 colonoscopies conducted by 18 physicians and 6180 EGDs performed by 13 physicians were used to calculate a benchmark for patient comfort. Using the 75th percentile approach, the benchmark was 96.3% of colonoscopies and 95.9% of EGDs. The mean proportion of comfortable colonoscopies and EGDs among the top 25% of endoscopists was 96.8% and 96.8%, respectively. The ABC benchmark values were 97.1% for colonoscopy and 96.9% for EGD. Conclusion: SPECS of ≤3 is an acceptable level of comfort. All 3 benchmarking methods generated comparable results, suggesting that physicians should aim for 96% of their procedures have a SPECS ≤3.

Indexed as

benchmarkcomfortendoscopy

Identifiers

PMID42840329
PMCPMC13639355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.