ArticleJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology2026
Establishing a benchmark for patient comfort during colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy using the St. Paul's Endoscopic Comfort Scale (SPECS).
Article in Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: Patient comfort during endoscopy is an important performance measure. However, performance benchmarks for patient comfort have not been established. The aim of this study is to establish benchmarks for patient comfort during colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) using the St. Paul's Endoscopic Comfort Scale (SPECS). Patients and methods: Patient, nurse, and physician focus groups were conducted to establish an acceptable threshold of comfort using SPECS. SPECS for colonoscopy and EGD at St. Paul's Hospital from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023, were collected. Using the SPECS threshold, we calculated benchmarks using 3 approaches: (1) 75th percentile, (2) the mean of the top 25% of physicians, and (3) Achievable Benchmark of Care (ABC), which adjusts performance for procedural volume. Results: Four patients, 6 endoscopy nurses, and 10 physicians participated in separate focus groups: a SPECS ≤ 3 was the comfort threshold determined. SPECS from 17 405 colonoscopies conducted by 18 physicians and 6180 EGDs performed by 13 physicians were used to calculate a benchmark for patient comfort. Using the 75th percentile approach, the benchmark was 96.3% of colonoscopies and 95.9% of EGDs. The mean proportion of comfortable colonoscopies and EGDs among the top 25% of endoscopists was 96.8% and 96.8%, respectively. The ABC benchmark values were 97.1% for colonoscopy and 96.9% for EGD. Conclusion: SPECS of ≤3 is an acceptable level of comfort. All 3 benchmarking methods generated comparable results, suggesting that physicians should aim for 96% of their procedures have a SPECS ≤3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.