ArticleBiophysics and physicobiology2026
Denoising for high-magnification bioluminescence imaging of cells by machine learning with physics-based noise modeling of EMCCD.
Article in Biophysics and physicobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) detects light emission from samples expressing luciferase in the presence of luciferin. Unlike fluorescence imaging, BLI does not require excitation light, thereby avoiding phototoxicity in living cells and photobleaching of labels. However, the intrinsically slow turnover of the luciferin-luciferase reaction often results in low luminescence intensity, which degrades image quality and limits practical applications, particularly in high-magnification optical microscopy of cells. In this study, we demonstrate that image denoising provides an effective strategy to overcome this fundamental limitation of BLI. We developed a physics-based noise model that incorporates fixed-pattern noise, blooming noise, readout noise, quantization noise, and Poisson shot noise, enabling accurate estimation of noise parameters encountered in EMCCD-based microscopy. In the denoising pipeline, raw noisy images were first corrected for the fixed-pattern and blooming noises, followed by restoration using Uformer neural network trained with paired ground-truth images and synthetically generated noisy images. Quantitative evaluation using the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index measure (SSIM) showed that denoised images derived from raw data acquired with exposure times of ≤100 ms achieved PSNR and SSIM values comparable to those of raw images acquired with exposure times of 1-3 s. These results indicate that the proposed denoising approach substantially extends the practical limit of high-magnification BLI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.