ArticleJMA journal2026
Integrative Genomic Analysis Reveals Insulin Resistance as a Key Mediator in the Causal Link between Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatohepatitis and Hypertension.
Article in JMA journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is frequently associated with arterial hypertension, We used a multitiered Mendelian randomization (MR) framework to independently evaluate the causal link between MASH liability and hypertensive phenotypes. Methods: We performed a two-sample, two-step MR analysis leveraging genetic summary statistics from the Million Veteran Program (n = 218,595), UK Biobank (n = 735,757), and the Malignant Germ Cell International Consortium (n = 108,557). MASH liability was defined through four tiered instrument sets: (1) chronic alanine aminotransferase (cALT) proxy, (2) imaging-validated genetic instruments, (3) biopsy-validated genetic instruments, and (4) a high-stringency consensus set. Hypertensive outcomes included systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse pressure (PP). Multivariable MR was employed to adjust for body mass index and lipid fractions, while a two-step framework quantified the mediated effect of insulin resistance. Results: Genetic liability for MASH drove elevated blood pressure. Increased MASH was associated with elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) (β=0.62 mm Hg; p<0.001), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (β=0.39 mm Hg; p<0.001), and pulse pressure (PP) (β=0.28 mm Hg; p<0.01). Effects were amplified in the biopsy-validated tier (SBP: β=1.07 mm Hg; p<0.01). Insulin resistance significantly mediated these causal effects: 33.2% for SBP, 36.9% for DBP, and 30.7% for PP. Sensitivity analyses confirmed result robustness. Conclusions: MASH causally increases hypertension risk independently of traditional metabolic factors. Insulin resistance is a pivotal mediator, suggesting treating hepatic metabolic dysfunction offers systemic cardiovascular benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.