ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Association between post procedural parenteral anticoagulation therapy and clinical outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with high thrombotic risk.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current guidelines advise against routine use of parenteral anticoagulation therapy (PACT) for ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the effectiveness of PACT in such patients with high thrombotic risk remains uncertain. To determine the impact of PACT on STEMI patients with high thrombotic risk. Methods: We enrolled STEMI patients with high thrombotic risk from four Chinese hospitals between 1 January 2010, and 31 December 2022. STEMI patients with high thrombotic risk were categorized them into PACT and non-PACT groups. We used multivariate, propensity score, and subgroup analyses to examine the relationship between PACT and clinical outcomes. The primary outcomes were in-hospital all-cause death and in-hospital major bleeding. Results: Out of 2,001 PCI patients, 473 received PACT. PACT was not associated with a lower all-cause death (adjusted OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.33-1.48; P = 0.349) and was not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (adjusted OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.32-2.18; P = 0.720). After a median follow-up of 1.72 years, PACT did not significantly affect all-cause death and major adverse clinical events compared to non-PACT, as confirmed by propensity score and subgroup analyses. Conclusion: PACT was not statistically associated with a reduced risk of in-hospital all-cause death and an increased risk of major bleeding in STEMI patients with high thrombotic risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.