ReviewJournal of tropical medicine2026
Mechanisms, Significance, Detection and Emerging Therapies for Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales: A Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of tropical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Carbapenems are among the most important broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics for the treatment of severe infections caused by multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. However, the global emergence and dissemination of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), particularly carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), have significantly compromised their clinical utility. Resistance is primarily driven by the acquisition of genes encoding carbapenemases, often in combination with porin alterations, efflux pump overexpression and AmpC hyperproduction, resulting in limited treatment options and increased morbidity and mortality. Objectives: This scoping review aimed to synthesise current evidence on the molecular mechanisms of carbapenem resistance, the classification and epidemiology of carbapenemases, advances in diagnostic approaches and emerging therapeutic strategies for CRE infections. Methods: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Literature published between January 2005 and March 2026 was identified through systematic searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar. Eligible studies included original research articles, surveillance reports, systematic reviews and clinical guidelines addressing carbapenem resistance mechanisms, carbapenemase epidemiology, diagnostics or treatment strategies. Data were extracted and synthesised using a narrative and thematic approach. Results: Carbapenemase production was identified as the predominant mechanism of resistance among CRE, with KPC, NDM, OXA-48-like, VIM and IMP enzymes driving global dissemination. Considerable geographical variation exists in carbapenemase distribution, reflecting differences in antimicrobial use, surveillance capacity and healthcare infrastructure. Advances in molecular diagnostics, including polymerase chain reaction, loop-mediated isothermal amplification, whole-genome sequencing and rapid immunochromatographic assays, have improved detection and surveillance. Emerging therapeutic options, particularly novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol, have expanded treatment possibilities, although resistance to newer agents continues to emerge. Conclusions: CREs remain a major global public health threat. Strengthened surveillance systems, improved access to rapid diagnostics, carbapenemase-directed therapeutic strategies and continued antimicrobial development are essential to limit the spread of resistance and improve clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.