ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Integrating narrative medicine into post-genocide Rwandan healthcare: a call for trauma-responsive medical education.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review examines the potential integration of narrative medicine into Rwanda's post-genocide healthcare system, where long-term psychological consequences continue to shape patient experiences and clinical practice. Despite significant improvements in health system performance since 1994, Rwanda's post-genocide context continues to shape emotionally demanding clinical encounters for patients and healthcare professionals. Narrative medicine refers to the clinical and educational capacity to attend to, interpret, and respond ethically to patients' illness stories. International literature suggests that narrative-based education may strengthen social and relational competencies, including empathy, perspective-taking, reflective capacity, and communication; however, these findings are context-dependent and require Rwanda-specific evaluation. In this review, the Chinese clinical narrative thinking framework serves as one possible analytic scaffold, not a model to be transferred uncritically. Its value is that it organizes narrative competence into four teachable clinical domains: narrative diagnostic thinking, narrative decision-making, narrative patient education, and narrative care or intervention. These domains are considered alongside foundational narrative medicine, illness narrative, reflective practice, and trauma-informed care frameworks. Although Rwanda has strong traditions of storytelling, testimony, and collective healing, these community and public practices are not direct equivalents of clinical narrative medicine. Narrative medicine has not yet been systematically integrated into Rwandan medical education or routine clinical practice, and any future integration would require trauma-sensitive safeguards, careful professional boundaries, and empirical evaluation. This review integrates deliberately selected global and context-specific literature to examine the theoretical underpinnings of narrative medicine, its significance to Rwanda's sociocultural storytelling and collective healing, and the gaps in medical education. While Rwanda-specific empirical evidence remains limited, the convergence of ongoing mental health needs, national workforce expansion, and strong narrative traditions presents a timely opportunity to develop trauma-responsive healthcare models relevant to post-conflict societies globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.