ReviewEJHaem2026
Efficacy and Safety of CAR T-Cell Therapy for Primary and Secondary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in EJHaem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with relapsed or refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and secondary central nervous system lymphoma (SCNSL) have limited treatment options and poor outcomes. CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown promising activity in this setting; however, the available evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate its efficacy and safety. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to 31 August 2025. Twenty-three prospective and retrospective studies involving 547 patients were included. Random-effects meta-analyses of proportions were performed to estimate pooled 12-month overall survival (OS), 12-month progression-free survival (PFS), complete response (CR), cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Results: The pooled 12-month OS and PFS rates were 64.5% (95% CI, 49.0%-76.0%) and 51.0% (95% CI, 35.0%-68.0%), respectively. The pooled CR rate was 52% in PCNSL and 40% in SCNSL. CRS occurred in 76% of patients with PCNSL and 77% with SCNSL, while ICANS occurred in 50% and 46%, respectively. Most adverse events were manageable with standard supportive care. Conclusions: CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy is associated with encouraging survival and response outcomes and an acceptable safety profile in relapsed or refractory PCNSL and SCNSL. However, the available evidence is predominantly retrospective with clinical heterogeneity and relatively short follow-up, underscoring the need for larger prospective studies with longer follow-up. Trial Registration: The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.