ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2026
Evaluation of the phytochemical profile, biological activities, and acute toxicity of
Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Using both experimental and Methods: Cistus ladanifer aerial parts were collected in the Khenifra region, Morocco. Hydroethanolic (Soxhlet) and aqueous (decoction) extracts were prepared. Physicochemical parameters, mineral content (ICP-AES), phytochemical screening, total polyphenols, flavonoids, and condensed tannins were determined. HPLC/UV-ESI-MS was used for chemical profiling. Antioxidant activity was assessed by TAC, DPPH, and FRAP assays; antimicrobial activity by MIC and MBC/MFC against bacterial and fungal strains; acute toxicity in mice at 2 g/kg; antihyperglycemic activity by oral glucose tolerance test in rats; and molecular docking against selected antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antihyperglycemic protein targets. Results: Physicochemical analysis of the plant material showed a moisture content of 12.68% ± 0.42%, pH of 4.16 ± 0.05, and ash content of 5.50% ± 0.31%. Mineral analysis revealed essential elements such as Zn, Mn, Fe, and Al. Phytochemical screening confirmed major secondary metabolites, including flavonoids, tannins, saponins, and alkaloids. The hydroethanolic extract exhibited the highest extraction yield (23.81% ± 0.63%), whereas the aqueous extract ( Discussion: Our findings highlight
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.