ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Liraglutide use in congenital generalized lipodystrophy: glycemic and metabolic outcomes.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Evidence on glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in lipodystrophies is limited. We evaluated the effects of liraglutide on metabolic control and satiety in patients with congenital generalized lipodystrophy (CGL). Methods: In this case series, patients with CGL received liraglutide 1.8 mg/day for 12 weeks. Metabolic parameters, satiety, and body composition were assessed at baseline, week 12, and after a 12-week post-treatment follow-up (week 24). Liver imaging was performed at baseline and week 12. Results: Eight patients were enrolled (aged 24-45 years; 75% female), and three discontinued treatment due to gastrointestinal adverse events during the dose-escalation phase. Among the five participants who completed the 12-week intervention, liraglutide significantly reduced HbA1c (median change, -2.5%; p=0.012) and total daily insulin dose (-20%; p=0.042), whereas the reduction in triglyceride levels was not statistically significant. Twelve weeks after liraglutide discontinuation, median HbA1c and body weight increased by 2.2% (p=0.026) and 3.7% (p=0.001), respectively. Triglyceride levels increased in 80% of participants, with a median increase of 421.5 mg/dL (p=0.334). Insulin requirements also increased overall: one participant resumed insulin therapy, while the remaining participants increased their insulin dose by a median of 22% (p=0.024). Conclusions: This first study of liraglutide in CGL provides an exploratory signal of improved glycemic control and reduced insulin requirements, but treatment tolerability remains a limitation. Larger, controlled, and longer-term studies are needed to confirm these effects and assess potential benefits on satiety, body composition, and liver disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.