ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2026
The Potential Evocative Effect of Leisure Item Omission in the Attention and Escape Conditions of a Functional Analysis.
Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The potential suppressive effects of leisure items in the attention condition of functional analyses have been documented (Ringdahl et al., 2002; Roscoe et al., 2008). However, the potential evocative effects of their absence have not been as thoroughly explored. The current study evaluated the impact of the omission of leisure items in a standard attention or escape condition of a functional analysis. Two participants exhibited leisure item requests and target behavior when the programmed establishing operation for attention or escape was absent during an initial functional analysis of their target behavior. This pattern of responding led to a modification of conditions in which preferred leisure items were included in the attention or escape condition for both participants, resulting in the absence of target behavior. A follow-up component analysis verified that the omission of leisure items and not the programmed establishing operation were responsible for the higher levels of responding in the respective test conditions. Results are discussed in the context of decision-making processes in functional analysis design; a recommendation is made to adopt routine measures of requests and programmed-establishing-operation-absent behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.