Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42840177›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2026

Defining Collaborative Practices in Behavior Analysis.

Dani Pizzella, Cheryl Light-Shriner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dani PizzellaCollege of Education, University of Missouri-St. Louis, 1 University Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63121 USA.ORCID 0009-0009-4352-6823
Cheryl Light-ShrinerDepartment of Special Education, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1310 S. Sixth Street, Champaign, IL 61820 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collaboration is a fundamental practice across various disciplines, including education and school-based services such as special education (McLeskey et al., 2017), speech-language pathology (ASHA, 2024), school psychology (NASP, 2020), social work (NASW, 2012), and applied behavior analysis (BACB, 2020; BACB, 2022). This study examined how behavior analysts describe and engage in collaborative practices in school settings, analyzing qualitative data from 253 survey responses. Four primary themes emerged: (1) valuing the expertise of all team members, including families; (2) focusing on student-centered activities aligned with goals; (3) communicating respectfully and working together; and (4) making data-based decisions. Two secondary themes highlighted challenges to collaboration. Findings address a gap in the literature that examines the Board Certified Behavior Analysts' (BCBAs) reported collaborative practices in school settings and suggest the following implications:The generalist nature of BCBA preparation training may influence how behavior analysts describe and engage in collaborative practices within school settings.Existing definitions of collaboration can provide beneficial guidance for how to further articulate the scope of competence of behavior analysts who work within a range of employment settings, including schools.Targeted preservice and continuing education requirements and opportunities for interprofessional education and collaboration that focus on unique skills and perspectives within employment settings, including schools, could improve behavior analysts' partnerships.Articulating the roles and challenges of behavior analysts employed within schools could help guide conceptually systematic behavior analytic collaborative practices in those settings. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-025-01089-2.

Indexed as

BCBAsCollaborative PracticesSchools

Identifiers

PMID42840177
PMCPMC13638908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.