ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Spatiotemporal gait parameters and ground reaction force analysis in female non-gymnasts
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Gymnastics requires balance, coordination, and flexibility, making it both enjoyable and challenging. However, ensuring safety is crucial to prevent injuries. This study aimed to assess key spatiotemporal gait parameters, including cadence, velocity, stride length, cycle time, and step width, in conjunction with the anteroposterior ground reaction force (GRF-X) across five sub-phases of the gait cycle, in female gymnasts and non-gymnasts during the adolescence and university stages. Methods: In this study, 40 participants were recruited and categorized into two primary groups based on age: Group I represented the adolescent stage and comprised female middle school students, and Group II represented the university stage and comprised female university students. Each primary group was further divided into two subgroups: non-gymnasts and gymnasts. Therefore, four distinct groups were formed: 10 non-gymnast female middle school students, 10 gymnast female middle school student, 10 non-gymnast female university students, and 10 gymnast female university students. Participants were matched for age, height, and weight. A two-way multivariate ANOVA (MANOVA) was performed to evaluate the effects of group (junior Results: The results indicated significant differences between female middle school gymnasts and non-gymnasts in cadence, speed, cycle time, and step width. Similarly, significant differences were identified between female university students who were gymnasts and those who were not, specifically in cadence, speed, and stride length. Furthermore, the mean values of GRF-X during the initial contact, loading response, and mid-stance phases differed significantly between female middle school gymnasts and non-gymnasts. Additionally, a significant difference was noted between gymnast and non-gymnast female university students during the initial contact and mid-stance phases. Conclusion: The results revealed significant alterations in the GRF-X values across the four groups. Furthermore, the cadence, speed, cycle time, and step width exhibited significant differences between the non-gymnast and gymnast groups; therefore, it is recommended to strengthen lower limb muscles, normalize gait parameters, and improve ankle range of motion to mitigate injury risk. Normal gait provides a fundamental benchmark for subsequent comparisons with task-specific activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.