Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42840115›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026

Clinical case analysis and finite element analysis of Beavis type II avulsion fractures of the calcaneal tuberosity.

Changpeng Cao, Faxin Cao, Xiyao Wang, Haiyang Xing, Gang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Changpeng CaoDepartment of Orthopedics, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Faxin CaoDepartment of Orthopedics, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Xiyao WangFirst Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Haiyang XingDepartment of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Gang WangDepartment of Orthopedics, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures are primarily caused by intense traction of the Achilles tendon. Clinical treatment remains challenging, with a high failure rate. Current research mainly focuses on injury mechanisms, retrospective analyses, and case discussions, while biomechanical experimental evidence is still lacking. Therefore, selecting the most appropriate internal fixation method to achieve satisfactory outcomes remains a key issue to be addressed. Methods: This study employed finite element analysis to compare the fixation efficacy of five internal fixation techniques for type II calcaneal tuberosity fractures. Clinical cases involving treatment failure were retrospectively reviewed to explore the management process and underlying causes, aiming to provide a mechanical basis and reference for future clinical practice. Results: The 180° annular plate was identified as the optimal fixation method for treating such fractures. In addition, the Achilles tendon tension band technique significantly reduced the risk of treatment failure. Conclusion: For type II calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures, the 180° annular plate provides the best biomechanical performance, while the Achilles tendon tension band technique also effectively lowers the failure rate. These findings offer valuable mechanical evidence to guide clinical decision-making and improve surgical outcomes.

Indexed as

Beavis II avulsion fracture of calcaneal tuberositycalcaneal tuberosity avulsion fracturesfinite element analysisfixation methodsosteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID42840115
PMCPMC13638624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.