ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Parameter-free dual-student ensemble for semi-supervised ischemic stroke segmentation on follow-up NCCT.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) is widely used for post-treatment monitoring of patients with ischemic stroke due to its rapid acquisition, low cost, and non-invasiveness. Segmentation of ischemic lesions on NCCT images is critical for assessing disease severity and guiding clinical decision-making. Methods: We propose an ensemble-based semi-supervised segmentation (ESS) framework to reduce the dependence of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) on a large number of manual annotations. The proposed method mainly consists of two components: first, strong data augmentation is introduced to increase sample diversity and alleviate overfitting in the presence of limited labeled data; second, a parameter-free ensemble module is adopted to generate more stable supervision signals for unlabeled samples and improve the reliability of pseudo-labels by fusing the predictions of the two student models. The proposed ESS is evaluated on a manually annotated follow-up NCCT dataset consisting of 9,020 image slices. Results: ESS consistently achieves the highest Dice coefficient among all compared methods under all four labeled-data ratios, with a more pronounced performance advantage when labeled data are scarce. Discussion: These results demonstrate the effectiveness of ESS for semi-supervised segmentation of follow-up NCCT under limited annotation conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.