ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Between gait and cognition: an exploratory mixed-methods study of cognitive-motor dual-task profiles and lived experience.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cognitive-motor dual tasking is widely studied. However, the results remain heterogeneous depending on the type of tasks and individual psychological factors. To address this variability, dual-task cost (DTC) frameworks allow classification of behavioral profiles. This study aimed to propose a method designed to identify individual determinants of dual-task (DT) behavior by combining quantitative gait and cognitive measures with qualitative analyses of lived experience. Methods: Thirty-three young healthy adults performed Raven's Progressive Matrices Test (RPMT) and treadmill walking in both single-task and DT conditions. Participants were classified into DT profiles according to DTC. Statistical tests were performed to assess whether the DTCs differed from zero and whether they differed between participants who reported having answered some items randomly and those who did not. Explicitation interviews were then conducted and analyzed independently of participants' quantitative DT profiles. Qualitative findings were subsequently integrated with the quantitative profiles at the interpretive stage to characterize individual DT behaviors. Results: Dual tasking significantly reduced RPMT response time ( Discussion: Distress and cognitive overload characterized mutual interference, analytical or automatized strategies supported cognitive-priority trade-offs, and relaxed immersion and positive affect facilitated mutual facilitation. Gait-priority participants reported bodily immersion and sensory detachment. Conclusion: Our mixed-method approach may offer a transferable methodology for clinical contexts, where understanding patient-specific strategies is crucial for rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.