ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026
Automatic diagnosis of retinoblastoma and quantitative analysis of retinal vascular morphology using deep learning.
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a convolutional neural network-based artificial intelligence identification diagnostic system for ultra-wide field fundus images of retinoblastoma (RB) and quantify its vascular morphology features. Methods: A retrospective study. 183 ultra-wide field fundus images from 54 patients diagnosed with RB were included, along with 250 images of healthy control. Of these, 277 images were used as the training set, 100 images were used as the validation set, and 56 images were used for the performance test. A deep learning based on DenseNet was used to train the AI auto-diagnostic network for RB. After manual labelling to remove the lesion area, the binary skeleton vessels of the retina were automatically extracted and segmented. Vascular morphological characteristics were subsequently assessed quantitatively using the corresponding mathematical model. Results: The diagnostic performance of the network was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity and F1 score, respectively. In the validation set, the automated diagnostic system achieved 0.98 sensitivity, 0.94 specificity, and 0.96 F1 score. In the test set, the system achieved 0.93 sensitivity, 0.79 specificity, and 0.87 F1 score. In quantitative vascular morphology analysis, compared with the healthy control group, the vascular angle of RB patients was increased, while the vascular density, fractal dimension, and number of vascular branches were decreased (all P < 0.001). Conclusion: In this study, we developed an artificial intelligence system for automatic identification and diagnosis of RB in ultra-wide field fundus imaging, and were able to automatically and quantitatively analyze the retinal vascular morphological features of patients with RB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.