ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Baseline indices of cardiorespiratory fitness for predicting acute mountain sickness: an interpretable four-task ensemble model.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute mountain sickness (AMS) poses formidable challenges for individuals venturing into high-altitude (HA) environments. Early and precise prediction of AMS is crucial for the timely identification of high-risk individuals and the development of effective treatment strategies. We sought to develop and validate an interpretable Acute Mountain Sickness Four-Task Ensemble (AMS-FTE) model for predicting AMS occurrence and severity according to the old and new LLS definitions. Methods: This study enrolled 330 healthy subjects who underwent rapid exposure to HA. Questionnaire surveys utilizing the Lake Louise Score for AMS were administered upon arrival. Five machine learning (ML) algorithms were evaluated independently for each prediction task, after which RF, AdaBoost, and LightGBM were combined to construct the AMS-FTE framework. To enhance interpretability, the SHapley Additive exPlanation method illuminated feature importance. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analysis were evaluated to calculate predictive power and assess the model's clinical applicability. Results: Following algorithm comparison, AMS-FTE model was constructed to provide unified predictions for the four AMS-related tasks. Based on feature importance rankings, interpretable final model was developed for each task using the top 5 contributing features, which were associated with baseline cardiopulmonary fitness (post-exercise heart rate, post-exercise SpO Conclusion: The predictive value of baseline cardiorespiratory fitness parameters proved valuable in distinguishing AMS and non-AMS subjects, as revealed through an interpretable ML model and a support system. This will enable earlier diagnosis for AMS, and more targeted interventions for acute altitude illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.