ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Longitudinal associations between structured teaching and attentional functioning in youth badminton: evidence from fixed effects quantile regression.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Structured teaching methods are widely used to promote attention in youth sports training. However, it is not clear whether this positive association is the same for all students or depends on the level of baseline attention. Traditional average effect analysis may mask important heterogeneity. Methods: A total of 433 young badminton players aged 12 to 16 years were followed up four times in this longitudinal study, and a total of 1,732 person-wave observations were obtained. Structured teaching intensity and attention scores were assessed at the time of each measurement. Time-dependent covariates included age, length of training per week, and fatigue. Linear fixed effects models were used to estimate the mean association, and fixed effects quantile regression was used to examine the association heterogeneity of attention on the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th conditional quantiles. Results: Linear fixed effects models showed a modest positive mean association between perceived structured instruction and attention (β = 0.219, Conclusions: The within-person association between perceived structured instruction and attentional function differed significantly in the conditional distribution of attention. The positive correlation was significantly stronger in the upper conditional quantile of attentional function and weaker in the lower conditional quantile. This pattern of differences suggests that uniform instructional strategies may risk reinforcing attentional differences. Coaches and educators should consider interventions that are adaptable and matched to individual doses. Given the observational longitudinal design, no causal conclusions can be drawn; the results reflect intra-individual associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.