ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
The effect of syntactic and semantic information on word grounding through visual perception.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Word grounding refers to the ability of agents to associate linguistic terms with the perceptual concepts they represent, such as color, shape, and spatial features. This study quantitatively evaluates how syntactic and semantic information affects word-grounding performance. Methods: We evaluated five configurations within a generative multimodal Bayesian framework. The baseline grounds words using perceptual cues, while the additional configurations independently incorporate word-position indices, part-of-speech tags, FastText embeddings, and transformer-based contextual embeddings. The models were evaluated using a CLEVR-derived 3D scene dataset and synonym-substituted descriptions. Results: Linguistic information improved grounding accuracy across the Color, Geometry, and Spatial Relation modalities. Contextual embeddings produced a 53.8% absolute improvement in object-grounding accuracy over the baseline. Only models incorporating semantic embeddings generalized effectively to synonym-substituted descriptions without retraining. Discussion: These findings demonstrate the contribution of linguistic structure and semantic representations to perceptual alignment and provide empirical foundations for developing language-grounding systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.