ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Case Report: Outpatient management of rectal infiltration by iodinated polyethylene glycol hydrogel and stabilized hyaluronic acid spacers in patients with prostate cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in men worldwide. Radiation therapy is a widely used treatment for prostate cancer, but it carries the risk of adverse effects on adjacent organs such as the rectum. Therefore, to provide additional protection for the rectum during prostate radiation, perirectal spacers are inserted into Denonvilliers' space, the thin fascial layer located behind the prostate gland and in front of the anterior rectal wall. Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based hydrogels and recently FDA-approved stabilized hyaluronic acid (sHA) spacers have been designed to create a biodegradable space between the prostate and rectum, with each having its own unique characteristics and both having the potential to infiltrate the rectum. We present two clinical cases of rectal infiltration associated with either the insertion of a PEG-based hydrogel or an sHA spacer. Due to the distinct characteristics of the two spacer types, rectal infiltration was managed with either a conservative or definitive approach. With the PEG-based hydrogel, we implemented conservative management with antibiotics and close monitoring. In sharp contrast, for the sHA spacer, we proactively reversed the infiltration with hyaluronidase (Hyal) prior to starting radiation. These cases illustrate the clinical utility of these management approaches and contribute to the growing body of evidence on the management of potential complications associated with perirectal spacers, potentially supporting the use of newer spacer technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.