ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Analysis of the relationship between mathematical learning stress and neuroendocrine response based on causal modeling.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study develops a methodological framework to investigate the relationship between mathematical learning stress and neuroendocrine responses through causal modeling. Traditional approaches often fail to capture the complex interplay between psychological stressors and physiological responses, limiting their ability to provide actionable insights. To address these limitations, we propose the Representation-Factorized-Optimal (RFO) model, which is specifically designed to model the intricate dynamics between stress experienced during mathematical learning and the associated neuroendocrine responses. Methods: The model integrates three core components: the Representation Consistency Enforcer (RCE), which ensures the stability and reliability of variable representations; the Factorized Relation Projector (FRP), which disentangles and projects the relationships between stress and neuroendocrine variables; and the Optimal Transport Matcher (OTM), which aligns these variables for robust causal inference. To further enhance the model's performance, we incorporate advanced techniques such as representation alignment and sparse representation learning, enabling the extraction of meaningful patterns from high-dimensional data. Results and Discussion: Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model achieves superior accuracy and interpretability compared to existing methods, providing a more nuanced understanding of the causal mechanisms underlying the interaction between mathematical learning stress and neuroendocrine responses. These findings hold significant implications for advancing research in the interdisciplinary fields of educational psychology and neurobiology, offering a robust tool for exploring the physiological impacts of cognitive stressors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.