Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42839922›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026

Interpretable machine learning for postoperative sepsis prediction in ICU patients following intracranial hematoma evacuation.

Shaoyang Yu, Yun Liu, Lei Guo, Jinchang He, Yuyuan Ge, Wan Yu, Weijian Jia, Kexiang Xiong, Zixiang Wang, Wei Gao and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shaoyang Yu *The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yun Liu *Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Lei GuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Jinchang HeThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yuyuan GeDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Jiangsu Province Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Wan YuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Jiangsu Province Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Weijian JiaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Jiangsu Province Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Kexiang XiongThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Zixiang WangSchool of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Wei Gao *Department of critical care medicine, Jiangsu Province Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yong Zhang *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Jiangsu Province Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a prevalent and life-threatening complication in ICU patients after intracranial hematoma evacuation. This study aimed to develop and externally validate an interpretable machine learning model for predicting sepsis risk in this high-risk neurocritical care population. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study was designed. The MIMIC-IV was based on for model development and internal testing; MIMIC-III, eICU and an independent clinical cohort from Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine for external validation. Sepsis during ICU stay was defined according to the operationalized Sepsis-3 criteria. Early ICU variables were selected using Boruta and LASSO, and six machine learning algorithms were developed and compared. Model performance was evaluated by discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis, and its interpretability was assessed using SHAP and LIME. A sensitivity analysis was conducted by retraining all six models after excluding baseline SOFA. Results: A total of 1,729 patients were included, of whom 717 developed sepsis during ICU stay. The final model retained 13 predictors, including WBC, SOFA score, SpO Conclusion: This study developed and externally validated an interpretable XGBoost-based model for predicting sepsis risk during ICU stay among patients after intracranial hematoma evacuation. The model showed generally consistent AUC-based discrimination across multiple validation cohorts and may support individualized risk stratification. Further prospective validation and clinical impact assessment are required before routine clinical implementation.

Indexed as

HematomaMachine LearningPostoperative ComplicationsSepsisAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective Studiesmachine learningmulti-database validationpostoperative sepsisSHAP analysisXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID42839922
PMCPMC13638375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.