ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Interpretable machine learning for postoperative sepsis prediction in ICU patients following intracranial hematoma evacuation.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis is a prevalent and life-threatening complication in ICU patients after intracranial hematoma evacuation. This study aimed to develop and externally validate an interpretable machine learning model for predicting sepsis risk in this high-risk neurocritical care population. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study was designed. The MIMIC-IV was based on for model development and internal testing; MIMIC-III, eICU and an independent clinical cohort from Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine for external validation. Sepsis during ICU stay was defined according to the operationalized Sepsis-3 criteria. Early ICU variables were selected using Boruta and LASSO, and six machine learning algorithms were developed and compared. Model performance was evaluated by discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis, and its interpretability was assessed using SHAP and LIME. A sensitivity analysis was conducted by retraining all six models after excluding baseline SOFA. Results: A total of 1,729 patients were included, of whom 717 developed sepsis during ICU stay. The final model retained 13 predictors, including WBC, SOFA score, SpO Conclusion: This study developed and externally validated an interpretable XGBoost-based model for predicting sepsis risk during ICU stay among patients after intracranial hematoma evacuation. The model showed generally consistent AUC-based discrimination across multiple validation cohorts and may support individualized risk stratification. Further prospective validation and clinical impact assessment are required before routine clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.