Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42839727›Full record

ArticleActa chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca2026

[Risk of Failure of Two Methods of Osteosynthesis of Fifth Metacarpal Neck Fracture].

Kvido Štěpánek, Milan Urban, Radek Bartoška, Petr Gutwald

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kvido ŠtěpánekOrtopedicko-traumatologicka klinika, 3. lekarska fakulta Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultni nemocnice Kralovske Vinohrady, Praha.
Milan UrbanOrtopedicko-traumatologicka klinika, 3. lekarska fakulta Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultni nemocnice Kralovske Vinohrady, Praha.
Radek BartoškaOrtopedicko-traumatologicka klinika, 3. lekarska fakulta Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultni nemocnice Kralovske Vinohrady, Praha.
Petr GutwaldOrtopedicke oddeleni, Nemocnice Slany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the studyFifth metacarpal neck fractures rank among the most common fractures of the hand skeleton. Only about 10% of these fractures are treated surgically. There are multiple surgical treatment options. This study aims to compare the outcomes of plate osteosynthesis with those of the "bouquet" technique. MATERIAL AND

methodsTwo cohorts of patients with fractures to the neck of fifth metacarpal treated at a district hospital and at a university hospital between 2017 and 2022 were evaluated, namely due to a different approach to fracture management. The district hospital cohort included 240 patients (215 men and 25 women). The mean age of patients was 31.5 years (15-91). At the university hospital, 363 patients were treated (323 men, 40 women), with a mean age of 30.3 years (16-87). In both cohorts, men outnumbered women (p < 0.0001). The exclusion criteria were age under 15 years and open fractures.

resultsThere were differences between the centers in both the indications for and the performance of non-surgical and surgical treatment. At the district center, 48 patients (20%) underwent surgery. All patients were treated using the "bouquet" technique. At the university center, 27 patients (7%) underwent surgery. Two different methods were used for osteosynthesis. Plate osteosynthesis prevailed (21 patients), while the "bouquet" technique was used less frequently (6 patients). The higher proportion of patients who underwent surgery at the district center was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: There are no studies in the current literature that clearly give preference to one method over the others. At both centers, a volar angulation of the peripheral fragment exceeding 30° was considered a radiographic indication for surgical treatment. A high percentage of patients who underwent surgery in the district cohort was due to a different non-surgical treatment approach. The study found no difference in clinical findings after fracture healing between patients treated surgically using the "bouquet" technique and those treated with plate osteosynthesis.

conclusionsAppropriate non-surgical treatment is essential for successful management of boxer's fractures. Physicians who treat musculoskeletal traumas should be adequately trained in this field. Where adequate non-surgical treatment is provided, only a small percentage of fractures require surgery. There are many surgical treatment options available; currently, none can be clearly recommended over the others. When comparing plate osteosynthesis and the "bouquet" technique, the authors' experience confirmed the well-known fact that displacement of fragments in the postoperative period can be prevented by adhering to all principles of good surgical practice for each treatment method.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, InternalFractures, BoneMetacarpal BonesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone PlatesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment FailureYoung Adult"bouquet" techniqueboxer´s fracturefifth metacarpal neck fractureplatingpostoperative reangulation.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.