ReviewInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2026
EACTS Expert Consensus Document on Civil Aviation Following Cardiothoracic Surgery and Transcatheter Procedures.
Review in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Civil aviation medicine and cardiothoracic surgery intersect at a point where individual clinical outcomes and public safety are tightly coupled. Professional aircrew and other safety-critical aviation personnel must meet legally defined medical standards that are designed around an engineering approach to risk, including a low annual tolerance for sudden incapacitation, whereas passengers and cabin crew are exposed to the physiological constraints of the flight environment (hypobaric hypoxia, gas expansion, limited access to medical care, immobility, and circadian rhythm disruption). Yet, the evidence base guiding fitness-to-fly decisions after cardiothoracic procedures, treatment of aortic disease, and contemporary transcatheter interventions remains sparse and unevenly distributed across procedures, licensing classes, and operational contexts. This European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Expert Consensus Document appraises the available literature and synthesizes multidisciplinary expert knowledge to provide pragmatic, safety-oriented guidance for aeromedical examiners, treating clinicians, regulators, employers, and affected individuals. Focusing on civil aviation, it addresses return-to-duty considerations for professional aircrew and postoperative air-travel decisions for passengers. Key clinical and occupational determinants include procedure choice and durability, residual ischaemia or haemodynamic burden, arrhythmia risk, anticoagulation and device-related considerations, rehabilitation and surveillance testing, and, where appropriate, the role of operational restrictions such as multicrew limitations. Finally, it identifies key knowledge gaps and research priorities to support more consistent, evidence-based decision-making in this high-stakes setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.