Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42839343›Full record

ReviewCancer medicine2026

CO-Rebreathing in Essential Thrombocythemia and Polycythemia Vera. A Revival of an Old Methodology to Improve Diagnosis and Phlebotomy Decisions.

Hans C Hasselbalch, Morten Kranker Larsen, Lea Løffler, Camilla Andersen, Isabella Davidsen, Mette Grymer Jensen, Jonas Bechlund, Lasse Kjær, Vibe Skov, Henning Bay Nielsen and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hans C HasselbalchDepartment of Hematology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3936-8032
Morten Kranker LarsenDepartment of Hematology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2873-5928
Lea LøfflerDepartment of Hematology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5903-4092
Camilla AndersenDepartment of Hematology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Isabella DavidsenDepartment of Hematology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0515-8432
Mette Grymer JensenDepartment of Hematology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2295-0422
Jonas BechlundDetalo Health Aps, Hørsholm, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6768-8695
Lasse KjærDepartment of Hematology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6767-0226
Vibe SkovDepartment of Hematology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0097-7826
Henning Bay NielsenDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3533-8098
Carsten LundbyCenter for Physical Activity Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnostic landscape for the Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), particularly in distinguishing Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) from Polycythemia Vera (PV), is compromised. The gold standard for diagnosing PV-measurement of red cell mass (RCM) by radioisotope dilution-has been largely abandoned, leading to widespread misclassification. Thus, an estimated 30%-50% (varying by diagnostic center and testing practice) of JAK2V617F-positive ET patients may, in fact, have "hidden" PV, depriving them of the cornerstone PV therapy: phlebotomy. This diagnostic inaccuracy exposes a sizable patient population to an unfortunate high risk of life-threatening thrombotic events. Concurrently, the management of established PV is suboptimal, often relying solely on hematocrit, a flawed parameter especially in iron-deficient or hydroxyurea-treated patients. This perspective calls for the revival and clinical implementation of the Carbon Monoxide (CO)-rebreathing technique as a promising, rapid, and nonradioactive alternative for RCM assessment. Herein, we review the history of this methodology and discuss its potential to improve MPN care by ensuring precise diagnosis, guiding rational phlebotomy, and ultimately reducing thrombotic morbidity and mortality, while also candidly addressing the current evidentiary and practical limitations that must be resolved before clinical adoption, while also offering potential health-economic benefits.

Indexed as

Carbon MonoxidePhlebotomyPolycythemia VeraThrombocythemia, EssentialDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansJanus Kinase 2Carbon MonoxideJanus Kinase 2

Identifiers

PMID42839343
PMCPMC13642976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.