Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42839266›Full record

SynthesisBMC women's health2026

Physical activity for psychological and physical well-being in menstruating individuals: an integrative review.

Mareike Hechinger, Barbara Silva Salla, Milena Mühlbauer

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mareike HechingerFaculty of Applied Healthcare Sciences, Deggendorf Institute of Technology, Land-Au 25 + 27, Deggendorf, 94469, Germany. mareike.hechinger@th-deg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8675-7922
Barbara Silva SallaFaculty of Applied Healthcare Sciences, Deggendorf Institute of Technology, Land-Au 25 + 27, Deggendorf, 94469, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3814-6131
Milena MühlbauerFaculty of Applied Healthcare Sciences, Deggendorf Institute of Technology, Land-Au 25 + 27, Deggendorf, 94469, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7426-7183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical and psychological symptoms vary across the menstrual cycle and may influence well-being and engagement in physical activity. While physical activity may alleviate menstrual pain, fatigue, and mood disturbances, evidence regarding beneficial types, intensities, and timing remains fragmented. This integrative review aimed to synthesise evidence on how physical activity contributes to psychological and physical well-being in menstruating individuals and to identify practically relevant recommendations.

methodsAn integrative review was conducted using a PIO-based search strategy. CINAHL, PubMed/MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for peer-reviewed studies published in English or German between 2010 and 2025, supplemented by backward and forward citation tracking. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies examining physical activity in relation to psychological and/or physical well-being across the menstrual cycle were eligible. Three reviewers independently screened records using predefined criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).

resultsFifty-five studies comprising 13,856 participants were included, with randomised controlled trials being most common (n = 31; 56.4%). Three domains emerged: menstrual pain and somatic symptoms; premenstrual and emotional symptoms; and quality of life, sleep, and daily functioning. Physical activity was predominantly associated with reductions in symptom burden and improvements in well-being. Evidence was most consistent for reductions in menstrual pain and somatic symptoms, particularly following mind-body approaches. Aerobic and other exercise modalities also showed beneficial but more heterogeneous findings. Improvements in premenstrual and emotional symptoms were frequently reported, whereas evidence for quality of life, sleep, and daily functioning was more limited. Heterogeneity in exercise modalities, intervention characteristics, and outcome assessment limited direct comparisons.

conclusionsPhysical activity may improve psychological and physical well-being in menstruating individuals, with the most consistent evidence for menstrual pain and somatic symptoms; findings for premenstrual, emotional, and quality-of-life outcomes were less consistent. Mind-body approaches such as yoga and Pilates showed particularly promising results. Rather than supporting a uniform cycle-based prescription, the findings point towards an individualised and symptom-responsive approach that also takes underlying conditions into account. More standardised and methodologically robust research is needed to establish specific recommendations and better understand experiences of physical activity across the menstrual cycle.

Indexed as

ExerciseMenstrual CycleMenstruationQuality of LifeDysmenorrheaFemaleHumansPsychological Well-BeingExerciseMenstrual cycleMenstrual mood changesPhysical activityPremenstrual syndromePrimary dysmenorrhoeaQuality of lifeWell-beingWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID42839266
PMCPMC13640090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.