Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2026
Feasibility and candidate risk factors for postoperative delirium in older ward patients: a prospective pilot study.
Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative delirium (POD) is a frequent neuropsychiatric complication after surgery, characterized by acute disturbances in attention, awareness, and cognition. This pilot study assessed the feasibility of a multidimensional assessment protocol and investigated candidate risk factors for POD in older patients undergoing elective surgery.
methodsThis prospective, observational, non-interventional, single-center pilot study enrolled 150 patients aged ≥ 65 years undergoing elective surgery lasting ≥ 60 min. Patients with dementia, neurological disorders (documented diagnoses), or emergency procedures were excluded. After enrollment, 10 patients were excluded due to surgery postponement or unplanned ICU admission, leaving 140 patients for analysis. Data were collected preoperatively, on postoperative days 1-3. Intraoperative and laboratory data were obtained from databases. Handgrip strength was measured by dynamometry. POD was assessed using the CAM-ICU once daily on postoperative days 1-3 by a single trained investigator. Cognitive function and reserve were evaluated using MMSE and MWT-B, frailty with the Clinical Frailty Scale, nutritional status with screening tools, and pain via the Numeric Rating Scale. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied.
resultsPOD incidence was 5.0% (n = 7/140; 95% CI: 2.0%-10.0%). Frailty (n = 4/7 [57%] vs. n = 26/133 [20%]) and malnutrition (n = 4/7 [57%] vs. n = 29/133 [22%]) were more common in the delirium group. In an exploratory, unpowered male subgroup analysis, patients with POD had lower preoperative handgrip strength; no statistically meaningful difference was testable in women (n = 3 with POD). During anesthesia induction, patients with POD experienced more hypotensive episodes (MAP<55 mmHg), (n = 3/7 [43%] vs. n = 11/133 [8.0%]). No comparison remained significant after Holm-Bonferroni correction.
conclusionThis pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of prospective POD assessment on a general surgical ward and provides an incidence estimate (5.0%) to inform sample-size calculation for confirmatory trials. Frailty, lower preoperative handgrip strength in men, and induction hypotension were more frequent among patients with POD. Given the low event rate and multiple comparisons, these associations are hypothesis-generating and require validation in adequately powered studies.
trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register DRKS00031157. Registered 20.03.2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.